Understanding Peak Credit Concept in Income Tax Evaluations

Understanding Peak Credit Concept in Income Tax Evaluations

When the Assessment Officer (AO) encountered undisclosed cash receipts or deposits in the taxpayer’s bank account without satisfactory explanation, a common tactic was for the taxpayer to assert that these deposits originated from withdrawals noted in the same account or cash book. Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, treated the highest of such deposits as concealed income. Let’s delve into comprehending the Concept of Peak Credit in Income Tax Assessments.

Peak Credit Theory

In the realm of Income Tax assessment, taxpayers aimed to prevent the potential double counting of their income, offering only genuine income for tax purposes. The peak credit hypothesis came into play when there were numerous unexplained credit and debit entries. This theory was pertinent to fraudulent entries, as legitimate credits and debits offset each other unless circumstances indicated otherwise.

However, if the taxpayer admitted the genuineness of cash deposits, the advantage under peak credit theory was forfeited. [Reference: Bhaiyalal Shyam Behari vs. Income-Tax Commissioner (2006) 202 CTR All 515]

Moreover, if the AO could demonstrate that withdrawals were not meant for redeposit, the taxpayer could not claim the benefit under peak credit theory.

It was worth noting that the peak credit theory wasn’t confined to monetary credits received by the taxpayer. Unaccounted cash might infiltrate the books as cash credit or trade credit, both constituting deemed income for the taxpayer. If the taxpayer could establish that such credits were spurious, the peak credit theory applied to trade credits as well.

Determining Peak Credit

The computation of peak credit involved sequential steps:

Adjustments to Peak Credit

After determining peak credit, the AO had to make certain adjustments:

Conclusion

Peak credit denoted the highest undisclosed cash available. Under the peak credit concept, if withdrawn cash remained unspent, it might be deemed for deposits. Identifying peak credit enabled taxpayers to reduce taxable income. However, failure to verify the return of withdrawals to the account forfeited this advantage.

Liked the post? Share this:
editor
editor@nyca.in
No Comments

Post A Comment

Disclaimer

We have taken all steps to ensure that the information on the website has been obtained from reliable sources and is accurate. However, this website is not intended to give legal, tax, accounting or other professional guidance. We recommend appropriate advice be taken prior to initiating action on specific issues.