High Court Directs Assessing Officer to Allow Assessee Time for Response - CA in Jaipur | CA. Yogesh Jangid |ITR Filing 2023 | Company Registration | NGO Registration | Income Tax Raid Cases | Audit | Inc Incroporation | CPA in India | Subsidy | Project Funding | GST | GST Raid Cases | Income Tax Notice Faceless | DRI Cases
8093
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-8093,single-format-standard,bridge-core-2.5,cstmsrch_bridge,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,hide_top_bar_on_mobile_header,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-23.5,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.4.1,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-7,elementor-page elementor-page-8093

High Court Directs Assessing Officer to Allow Assessee Time for Response

High Court Directs Assessing Officer to Allow Assessee Time for Response

Introduction:

In a recent case concerning a works contractor and registered GST dealer, the High Court intervened due to procedural discrepancies. The petitioner, after receiving an intimation followed by a show cause notice from the department, requested a two-month extension to respond, citing ongoing verifications by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI). However, the Assessing Officer proceeded without considering this request, leading to the petitioner’s contention that their response was overlooked. Here’s a paraphrased rendition of the court’s ruling:

Facts of the Case:

The petitioner, engaged in works contracting and registered under GST, underwent inspection by the department. Subsequently, they received an intimation and a show cause notice (SCN). Responding to the intimation, the petitioner sought a two-month extension to reply, citing ongoing verifications by the DGGI. However, their request was disregarded, and the department issued the impugned order without allowing the requested time.

Held:

The High Court observed that the petitioner’s response, along with the request for an extension, was duly submitted, indicating ongoing proceedings with the Central GST Authorities. Despite this, the Assessing Officer proceeded without considering the request, resulting in the issuance of the impugned order. Consequently, the Court deemed the order to be flawed and directed the Assessing Officer to afford the assessee an opportunity for a response, including a personal hearing, before issuing a fresh order.

Liked the post? Share this:
editor
editor@nyca.in
No Comments

Post A Comment

Disclaimer

We have taken all steps to ensure that the information on the website has been obtained from reliable sources and is accurate. However, this website is not intended to give legal, tax, accounting or other professional guidance. We recommend appropriate advice be taken prior to initiating action on specific issues.